AACR 2011 ~ 102nd meeting

The American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) is the oldest and largest scientific organization in the world focused on every facet of cancer research. AACR was founded in 1907 by 11 physicians and scientists interested in research with the goal to “to further the investigation and spread the knowledge of cancer.” Since then, the AACR has grown to 33,000 members and publishes seven peer-reviewed journals: Cancer Research; Clinical Cancer Research; Molecular Cancer Therapeutics; Molecular Cancer Research; Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention; and Cancer Prevention Research, and launched a new journal in 2010, Cancer Discovery.

AACR’s mission is to accelerates progress toward the prevention and cure of cancer by promoting research, education, communication, and collaboration.

The 102nd Annual Meeting 2011 begins April 2 in Orlando FL and will feature over 6000 abstracts presented by basic science, translational, and clinical researchers. Over 17,000 attendees and presenters will learn in a variety of settings: plenary lectures, symposia, minisymposia, workshops, poster sessions, and other formats.

A selection of neuroblastoma-related presentations

Several presentations and posters on neuroblastoma are of interest. Click on the title to see the abstract on AACR site.

4336/4 – Oncolytic reovirus as a novel therapy for neuroblastoma Amelia Kellar, Nicole Redding, Karen Blote, Qiao Shi, Jason Spurrell, Paul Beaudry, Don Morris. University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada Poster Session

4340/8 – Sorafenib induces growth arrest and apoptosis in neuroblastoma cells via inhibition of JAK2/STAT3 and MEK1/2/MAPK (p44/42) signaling pathways Fan Yang1, Veronica Jove1, Ralf Buettner1, Hong Xin1, Sangkil Nam1, Tasnim Ara2, Yves A. DeClerck2, Robert C. Seeger2, Hua Yu1, Richard Jove1. 1City of Hope, Duarte, CA; 2The Saban Research Institute of Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA Poster Session

4346/14 – Differential response of a novel protein kinase C-iota inhibitor (ICA-1) on neuroblastoma cells Prajit P. Pillai, Mildred Acevedo-Duncan. Univ. of South Florida, Tampa, FL Poster Session

954 – ABCC/MRP multidrug transporters contribute to neuroblastoma biology, pathogenesis and clinical outcome, independently of any role in cytotoxic drug efflux Murray D. Norris1, Michelle J. Henderson1, Antonio Porro2, Marcia Munoz1, Nunzio Iraci2, Chengyuan Xue1, Jayne Murray1, Claudia Flemming1, Jamie Fletcher1, Samuele Gherardi2, Alan Kwek1, Amanda Russell1, Wendy B. London3, Allen B. Buxton3, Lesley Ashton1, Alan C. Sartorelli4, Susan L. Cohn5, Manfred Schwab6, Glenn M. Marshall1, Giovanni Perini2, Michelle Haber1. 1Children’s Cancer Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia; 2University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; 3University of Florida and Children’s Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center, Gainesville, FL; 4Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; 5University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; 6German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany Minisymposium

4758 – Inhibition of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) as a potential therapeutic for pediatric neuroblastoma Mike R. Russell, Kristina A. Cole, John M. Maris. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA Minisymposium

LB-312/3 – Methylated RASSF1a is the first specific DNA marker for minimal residual disease testing in neuroblastoma Janine Stutterheim, Fatima Ait Ichou, Emmy Den Ouden, Rogier Versteeg, Huib N. Caron, Godelieve A.M. Tytgat, C. Ellen Van der Schoot. Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

4563/5 – Antibody targeting of anaplastic lymphoma kinase induces cytotoxicity of human neuroblastoma Erica L. Carpenter1, Elizabeth A. Haglund1, Adrian K. Chow1, Andrew C. Wood1, Lili T. Belcastro1, James G. Christensen2, Marc Vigny3, John M. Maris1, Mark A. Lemmon4, Yael P. Mosse1. 1Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; 2Pfizer Global Research and Development, La Jolla, CA; 3INSERM, Paris, France; 4University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA Poster Session

LB-366/11 – Patient-derived EBV-immortalized B-lymphocytes are a dominant contaminant of in vitro cultured human neuroblastoma tumor-initiating cells isolated from bone marrow. Sven Påhlman, Sofie A. Johnsson, Alexander Pietras, Caroline Wigerup, Ingrid Øra, Michael Andäng, Kenneth Nilsson, Tor Olofsson, David Gisselsson. Lund Univ., Malmö, Sweden, Lund Univ., Lund, Sweden, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, Uppsala Univ., Uppsala, Sweden Late-Breaking Poster Session

742/26 – Mechanisms of resistance to small molecule inhibition of anaplastic lymphoma kinase in human neuroblastoma Erica L. Carpenter1, Elizabeth A. Haglund1, Adrian K. Chow1, James G. Christensen2, John M. Maris1, Yael P. Mosse1. 1Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; 2Pfizer Global Research and Development, La Jolla, CA Poster Session

3942/29 – A pilot trial testing the feasibility of using molecular-guided therapy in patients with refractory or recurrent neuroblastoma Giselle L. Saulnier Sholler1, Javed Kahn2, William Ferguson3, Genvieve Bergendahl1, Erika Currier1, Shannon Lenox1, Jeffrey Bond1, William Roberts4, Deanna Mitchell5, Don Eslin6, Jacqueline Kraveka7, Joel Kaplan8, Nehal Parikh9, Suman Malempati10, Gina Hanna11, Barton Kamen12, Craig Webb13. 1University of Vermont, Burlington, VT; 2National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD; 3St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; 4University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA; 5Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI; 6MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando, Orlando, FL; 7Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; 8Levine Children’s Hospital, Charlotte, NC; 9Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Hartford, CT; 10Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; 11Inova Fairfax Hospital for Children and Women, Falls Church, VA; 12Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; 13Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI Poster Session

1558/6 – Paracrine signaling through Mycn enhances tumor-vascular microenvironment in neuroblastoma Yvan H. Chanthery, W. Clay Gustafson, William A. Weiss. UCSF, San Francisco, CA Poster Session

4350/18 – Translating diagnostic gene expression profiles for pediatric solid tumors Daniel H. Wai1, Michele R. Wing2, Kelley Kneile2, Yvonne Moyer2, Jonathan D. Buckley3, Robert C. Seeger4, Douglas S. Hawkins5, Stephen X. Skapek6, Timothy J. Triche4. 1Center for Personalized Medicine, Los Angeles, CA; 2The Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH; 3University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; 4Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; 5Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA; 6University of Chicago, Chicago, IL Poster Session

5237/25 – Development of organ-selective neuroblastoma cell lines to identify genes mediating bone marrow and liver colonization Zillan Neiron1, Kacper Jankowski1, Jayne Murray1, Sophia Champion2, Murray D. Norris1, Michelle Haber1, Jamie I. Fletcher1. 1Children’s Cancer Institute Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia; 2University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia Poster Session

130/14 – MiR-204 acts as a tumor suppressor in neuroblastoma through down-regulation of the neurotrophic receptor TrkB Jacqueline M. Ryan1, Amanda Tivnan1, Isabella Bray1, Joanna Fay1, Andrew M. Davidoff2, Lorraine Tracey2, Raymond Stallings1. 1Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland & National Children’s Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland; 2St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN Poster Session

4685 – Mechanistic guidance of ALK inhibition for the treatment of neuroblastoma Scott C. Bresler1, Andrew Wood2, Elizabeth Haglund2, James Christensen3, John M. Maris2, Mark A. Lemmon1, Yael P. Mosse2. 1University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; 2Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; 3Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, CA Minisymposium

1808/28 – Neuroblastoma cell lines established from progressive disease that exhibit partial or multi drug resistance are highly sensitive to chimeric receptor scFv(ch14.18)-zeta mediated NK cell killing Diana Seidel1, Anastasia Shibina2, C. Patrick Reynolds2, Winfried S. Wels3, Holger N. Lode1, Nicole Huebener1. 1University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany; 2Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX; 3Chemotherapeutisches Forschungsinstitut, Georg-Speyer-Haus, Frankfurt, Germany Poster Session

508/4 – Signal transduction and activator of transcription (STAT) 3 is necessary for environment-mediated drug resistance Tasnim Ara1, Rie Nakata1, Hiroyuki Shimada1, Ralf Buettner2, Robert C. Seeger1, Hua Yu2, Richard Jove2, Yves A. DeClerck1. 1USC/Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; 2Beckman Research Institute/City of Hope, Duarte, CA Poster Session

926 – Whole genome and transcriptome sequencing defines the spectrum of somatic changes in high-risk neuroblastoma Olena Morozova1, Inanc Birol1, Richard Corbett1, Karen Mungall1, Edward F. Attiyeh2, Shahab Asgharzadeh3, Yongjun Zhao1, Richard A. Moore1, Martin Hirst1, Steven Jones1, Michael D. Hogarty2, Sharon Diskin2, Yael P. Mosse2, Maura Diamond2, Richard Sposto3, Lingyun Ji3, Daniela S. Gerhard4, Malcolm A. Smith4, Javed Khan4, Robert C. Seeger3, Marco A. Marra5, John M. Maris2, the NCI TARGET Initiative. 1Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; 3Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; 4National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; 5Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency and Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada Minisymposium

1800/20 – 4-HPR (fenretinide) sensitizes human neuroblastoma cells for antibody-independent and ch14.18-mediated NK cell killing Anastasia Shibina1, Diana Seidel2, Srinivas Somanchi3, Holger N. Lode2, Dean A. Lee3, C.Patrick Reynolds1, Nicole Huebener2. 1Texas Tech Univ. Health Sciences Ctr., Lubbock, TX; 2University Medicine Greifswald, Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Greifswald, Germany; 3The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX Poster Session

1423/15 – Effects of DFMO-based combination therapy in advanced stage neuroblastoma Dana-Lynn T. Koomoa, Ingo Lange, Andre S. Bachmann. University of Hawaii, College of Pharmacy, Hilo, HI Poster Session

TARGET Project Team Highlights: Neuroblastoma Javed Khan. National Insts. of Health, Bethesda, MD NCI/NIH-Sponsored Session

NIH15. The NCI Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) Initiative: Using Large-Scale Genomics to Identify Novel Therapeutic Targets for Childhood Cancers

Towards a personalized approach to pediatric cancer management: Neuroblastoma as an example John M. Maris. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA Major Symposium
Recent Findings from Genomic Analyses of Tumors

5359/30 – Cytotoxicity of MLN8237 and SAHA in pediatric cancer cell lines Jodi Muscal1, Kathy Scorsone1, Jeffrey Ecsedy2, Stacey Berg1. 1Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; 2Millenium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA Poster Session

4756 – Exome sequencing of 81 neuroblastomas identifies a wide diversity of somatic mutation Trevor J. Pugh1, Michael Lawrence1, Carrie Sougnez1, Gad Getz1, Edward Attiyeh2, Michael Hogarty2, Sharon Diskin2, Mosse Yael2, Maura Diamond2, Shahab Asgharzadeh3, Richard Sposto3, Jun S. Wei4, Thomas Badgett4, Wendy B. London5, Julie Gastier-Foster6, Malcolm A. Smith4, Daniela S. Gerhard4, Robert Seeger3, Javed Khan4, Matthew L. Meyerson1, John M. Maris2, NCI Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) Initiative. 1The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA; 2Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; 3Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; 4National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; 5Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Children’s Oncology Group Statistic and Data Center, Boston, MA; 6Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH Minisymposium

Overview of environment: Mediated drug resistance Yves A. DeClerck. USC/Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA Educational Session

 

Leave a Comment

Two years of cis-retinoic acid

A new trial opens: prolonged use of isotretinoin

Aflac ST1001 Prolonged Isotretinoin

Dr Howard Katzenstein at Emory University (Aflac) in Atlanta Georgia is the principal investigator of a single-institution trial to explore the prolonged use of isotretinoin (13-cis retinoic acid, cisRA, and also known as”Accutane”). The phase I trial will accrue 20 children/young adults (under 30 years old) who will take isotretinoin after frontline therapy for 24 months instead of the current protocol using 6 months. The study will look at progression-free survival and toxicities, including bone growth and psychological effects.
.
Children will be enrolled after completing high-risk therapy. Since the COG-ANBL0931 ch14.18 antibody trial is also open at that institution, the prolonged use of isotretinoin trial will be offered to those children who do not qualify or refuse the ch14.18 trial.
.
This may be a promising strategy for increasing survival, but this is a small study and any survival advantage must be dramatic to be statistically significant. The toxicities of prolonged use of this dose isotretinoin in young children are unknown. In Germany, the GPOH frontline protocol current uses the same daily dose 160 mg/m2/d for 14 days per 28 day cycle for 6 months, 3 month break, and then another 3 months.
.
Effect on bone growth?

Growth in survivors of high-risk neuroblastoma can be affected by deficiency in growth hormones, as well as premature closure of growth plates in the long bones. Dr Lisa Diller (Boston Children’s/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) reviewed recent published data on late effects and presented new data in the Neuroblastoma Update Course the Advances in Neuroblastoma Research (ANR) meeting last June in Stockholm, Sweden[1]. She mentioned evidence from institutional data from CHOP (just published this month) that advanced bone age or epiphyseal closure and short stature is more common in children treated with cis-retinoic acid[2]. This report provides new evidence for careful consideration of long-term use of isotretinoin in small children.

Effect on emotions?

Since this drug is used in large numbers of adolescents and young adults for severe acne, a large amount of data has been accumulated on psychopathology, or psychological effects. A 2009 comprehensive review of the data concludes:

The evidence described in this review strongly suggests a link between the use of isotretinoin and psychopathology. There is a great number of reports that support this association. Interestingly, isotretinoin is the only non-psychotropic drug in the FDA’s top 10 list of drugs associated with depression. By contrast, the absence of double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, some flaws in the methodology of the current literature and some contradicting results in the studies of animal models seem to be the major reasons for the lack of an established causal link between isotretinoin use and psychiatric symptoms. However, given all the evidence, the association between isotretinoin use and psychopathology seems most likely to be justified. The multiformity of reported psychiatric adverse events (depression, suicide, psychosis) is probably associated with the multiplicity of isotretinoin’s effects on various neurotransmitter systems and with the various types of vulnerability of the exposed individuals. Therefore, clinicians should be on the alert for potential psychiatric side effects following treatment with isotretinoin, especially in vulnerable populations. [3]

An important point for neuroblastoma parents to note, however, is that all of the psychopathology reports on this drug to date have been on patients treated for acne, not neuroblastoma. The significant difference is in the dose used. Acne patients get between 0.1 -1.0 mg/kg/day, which is at most one-fifth the dose that is prescribed for children with neuroblastoma (roughly 5 mg/kg/day, given 14 days with 14 days rest). This review provides evidence that careful consideration is suggested with prolonged use of high-dose isotretinoin in adolescents and young adults.

Since survival advantage has been demonstrated by the use of isotretinoin in 1999, parents have often questioned why isotretinoin is only used for 6 months. Why not longer? This new trial may provide some answers to these questions, and all these points merit discussion with pediatric oncologists treating children with neuroblastoma.

 

References

1. ANR 2010 “Neuroblastoma Update Course” ANR 2010 Abstract Programme, p 80.

2. Prevalence of advanced bone age in a cohort of patients who received cis-retinoic acid for high-risk neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011 Mar;56(3):474-6.

3. Isotretinoin and psychopathology: a review Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Jan 20;8:2. PMCID: PMC2637283

 

Leave a Comment

Latest neuroblastoma related news

Neuroblastoma bits from November 2010

.

Excellent new review article on anti-GD2 antibodies

Just published by Yang and Sondel, this thorough review tracks the evolution of antibodies for neuroblastoma through three generations: murine, chimeric, and humanized, and explains the of mechanisms for tumor kill and results of all prior trials. The summary details all combinations with cytokines, modifications using radioisotopes and IL2, trials in progress and trials planned.
Full text is available online, and worth a careful read:

.

NCI featured article on ALK inhibitor Crizotinib

While encouraging responses are being seen in lung cancer patients with ALK mutation, drug resistance is expected to be a problem.

Crizotinib Continues to Show Promise for Some Lung Tumors, Faces Challenge of Drug Resistance

.

FDA discusses Crizotinib pediatric trial design

Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) Nov 30, 2010

“If the current COG Phase I/II studies evaluating crizotinib in refractory pediatric solid tumors or ALCL shows promising activity in neuroblastoma, should crizotinib be evaluated in the post-transplant relapsed/refractory setting or should a randomized trial in a less heavily treated population be considered? If the former population (i.e., post-transplant relapsed or refractory) is a more appropriate setting, please discuss whether Progression Free Survival (PFS) is an adequate endpoint.”

Committee discussion questions

.

Grant awarded to Insight Genetics for ALK mutation detection

“Insight ALK Screen™ assay offers labs a unique method for detecting the presence of any ALK fusion or mutation. It uses a real-time PCR platform, and provides faster, more reliable and cost-effective results than currently available methods”

Insight Genetics Awarded Qualifying Therapeutic Discovery Program Grant

.

Oncolytic Viruses in Cancer Therapy

Another comprehensive review from China in European Journal of Scientific Research: “In this review, we describe the basis of oncolytic virotherapy and the development of genetically modified tumor-specific viruses. We also summarize oncolytic virotherapy clinical trials and their… success rate, as well as the economical obstacles, and the evidence that oncolytic virotherapy may provide novel agents for metastatic diseases.” China is the first country to approve an oncolytic virus for cancer treatment.

http://www.eurojournals.com/ejsr_40_1_15.pdf

.

Scientific American describes the recent advances in viruses that kill cancer — now available to children this year for the first time –

“A new generation of oncolytic viruses are entering late-stage clinical trials, repurposing smallpox and herpesvirus to take on tough tumors.”
.

Search goes on for toxins to kill neuroblastoma

“Luesch is experimenting with toxins—drawn from several species of cyanobacteria—on several types of cancer, including neuroblastoma, a childhood disease that attacks nerve cells. In July 2009, he launched a four-year, $1.2 million NCI-funded study, part of which entails… largazole testing on mice.”

Childhood cancer survival in Australia

“Survival outcomes using the period method for 11903 children diagnosed with cancer between 1983 and 2006 and prevalent at any time between 1997 and 2006. The overall relative survival was 90.4% after 1 year,  79.5% after 5 years and 74.7% after 20 years.”

Accutane (cis-retinoic acid or isotretinoin) and depression?

A child with neuroblastoma is far more more often a preschooler than a teen. So the risk of suicide and depression is unlikely with such small children. It is a concern with the few teens and young adults with neuroblastoma on this drug, especially since the dosing is 2 to 10 times higher than what is prescribed for acne, and the lower dose is the basis for all the previous studies looking at incidence of depression and suicide. This small study gives important evidence that the drug may not contribute entirely to increased risk:

cme.medscape.com
In a retrospective Swedish cohort, suicide attempts were associated with severe acne even before treatment with isotretinoin was started.
.
.

Results just published — Phase I NANT study

Results in 21 neuroblastoma patients of zoledronic acid + low dose cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan): Responses in evaluable patients included 1 partial response, 9 stable disease (median 4.5 courses, range 3-18), and 10 progressions.

.

Phase I study of nifurtimox just published:

journals.lww.com
“The primary aim of this phase 1 study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the safety of nifurtimox alone and in combination with cyclophosphamide and topotecan in multiple relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma pediatric patients….Overall, nifurtimox was well tolerated by pediatric patients at a dose of 30 mg/kg/d, and tumor responses were seen both as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapy. A Phase 2 study to determine the antitumor efficacy of nifurtimox is currently underway.”
.

MetronomX donated $100,000 to the NB Alliance which funds the NMTRC

http://www.nmtrc.org/

Brand new company MetronomX to develop and produce nifurtimox (MNX-100)

http://www.metronomxgroup.com/about-metronomx.php

.
.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported.

Leave a Comment

ANR 2010 ~ Late Effects of Neuroblastoma Treatment

C10 (p. 80) “Late effects in neuroblastoma”

Dr Lisa Diller (Boston Children’s/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) reviewed recent published data on late effects and presented new data in the Neuroblastoma Update Course on June 21st, 2010 at the Advances in Neuroblastoma Research meeting in Stockholm, Sweden. The session was organized by Sue Cohn and Andrew Pearson and chaired by Sue Cohn and Rani George.

The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study provided long-term survivorship data for those treated for neuroblastoma between 1970 and 1986, and results on 954 5-year survivors were published in Journal of the National Cancer Institute August 2009.[1]

Of the 954 children, 832 records were abstracted, and only about 10% were stage 4 survivors, so the vast majority (~90%) of the survivor data most likely represented low and intermediate risk survivors.  Only 38% of the survivors had surgery + chemotherapy + radiation.  Of all the survivors, at least 90% had 15 years of follow-up. Of 1358 there were 84 deaths (41 recurrences)  and higher risk of death if diagnosed over the age of 5 and had multimodal therapy. The children treated for neuroblastoma were compared to a cohort of 3899 siblings to determine if there was a higher incidence of health problems. There was a higher incidence of chronic health conditions involving the neurological, sensory, endocrine, and musculoskeletal systems in children treated for neuroblastoma.

Dr Diller also mentioned evidence from soon-to-be published institutional data that advanced bone age or epiphyseal closure is more common in children treated with cis-retinoic acid than children who did not have cis-retinoic acid. There is a theoretical toxicity proposed related to cis-retinoic acid given with anti-GD2 antibody (ch14.18) because of clearance issues, but this has yet to be verified.[2]

References

1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Aug 19;101(16):1131-40. Epub 2009 Jul 31. [fulltext]

2. ANR 2010 “Neuroblastoma Update Course” ANR 2010 Abstract Programme, p 80.

Leave a Comment

CNCF 2010 ~ Dr Peter Zage on 3F8 phase II randomized trial

Dr Peter Zage from MD Anderson in Houston TX gave a presentation at the Children’s Neuroblastoma Cancer Foundation (CNCF) conference Saturday July 10, 2010 on the 3F8 randomized trial:

A Study of MAb-3F8 Plus Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) Versus 13-cis-Retinoic Acid (RA) Plus GM-CSF in Primary Refractory Neuroblastoma Patients (NCT00969722)

This trial is funded by United Therapeutics, who recently retained rights to 3F8. This trial is currently open in 15 locations and began accruing in 2009, with a planned accrual of 40 children 18 months to 13 years old. United Therapeutics has also entered into an agreement with Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) to exclusively license certain rights to the  antibody 8H9, used for brain relapse of certain tumors, including neuroblastoma.

This phase II randomized trial is a “registration trial” with the goal of gaining FDA approval for 3F8. The objective is to compare response rates in children with primary refractory disease to either 3F8 + GM-CSF or cis-retinoic acid (Accutane) + GM-CSF. Children who do not respond after two cycles may cross over to the other arm for the next two cycles. The children who have primary refractory disease–defined in this case as bone marrow or bone disease after induction or transplant, but no soft tissue disease– represent roughly 10% of all NB high-risk cases, or about 30 per year in the US, according to Dr Zage.  Children are not eligible if they have soft tissue disease, brain metastases, and they cannot have radiation during this trial.

A phase III (non-randomized) registration trial COG-ANBL0931 also opened in January 2010 and will accrue 105 patients: “Monoclonal Antibody Ch14.18, Sargramostim, Aldesleukin, and Isotretinoin After Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Neuroblastoma.”  The purpose of this trial is to gain FDA approval for the ch14.18 antibody.  According to the NIH clinical trials listing it is currently open in 29 locations. This trial also allows residual disease (primary refractory after stem cell transplant) by MIBG scan, CT scan, MRI, bone marrow aspiration, or biopsy.

The landmark phase III study COG-ANBL0032 that revealed efficacy for ch14.18 with IL2 and GM-CSF upon early analysis is also still open in 155 locations, with randomization ceased so all enrolled will receive ch14.18 (with GM-CSF and IL-2). [1]  The trial will accrue a total of 423. This trial also allows primary refractory disease described by the protocol.

Dr Zage gave a brief history of the development, production, and use of monoclonal antibodies in neuroblastoma. [2]

This is the first time 3F8 antibody has been available at an institution other than Memorial-Sloan Kettering in New York or Queen Mary Hospital in Hong Kong.

References

1. J Clin Oncol 27:15s, 2009 (suppl; abstr 10067z)

2. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009 May;8(10):874-82. Epub 2009 May 9. Review. [fulltext]

Leave a Comment

ANR 2010: MIBG avidity, tandem transplant (Korea), and ch14.18 (Germany) updates

MIBG non-avid at diagnosis = better outcome?

POC39 (p. 211) Neuroblastomas with non-avid I-123 MIBG scan and negative urinary catecholamine secretion: A single institute’s experience

PL30 (p. 102) Analysis of MIBG scoring as a prognostic indicator in patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma. A Children’s Oncology Group (A3973) report

Dui Yen Soh, Sylvain Baruchel, and Meredith Irwin at Sick Kids in Toronto reviewed 148 children diagnosed between 1999 and 2009 (all stages and risk groups). They confirmed the interesting observation that non-avid MIBG and negative urine catecholamines at diagnosis are associated with low stage and favorable outcome. Of the MIBG non-avid children, 5 were low risk, 3 were intermediate risk, and 3 were high risk. These numbers are too small to confirm better outcome for MIBG non-avid (at diagnosis) high-risk, but Greg Yanik (University of Michigan) mentioned an interesting observation of better survival for those high-risk children who are MIBG non-avid at diagnosis (of n= 280 enrolled in COG-A3973, 29 were MIBG negative at diagnosis) in his presentation on a new scoring method to stratify patients at the end of induction. He presented at ASCO 2010 Chicago, ANR 2010 Stockholm, and will present again next week at the CNCF Parent Conference in Chicago. More on Dr Yanik’s presentation to come.[1]

Any ideas why MIBG non-avid survival might be better? No answers proposed yet.

Tandem transplant in Korea

POC40 (p. 211) Efficacy of tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue in patients with high-risk Neuroblastoma: a preliminary report of NB 2004 study at Samsung Medical Center (Republic of Korea)

Ki Woong Sung and group reported at ANR results of 47 children diagnosed 2004 to 2008 and enrolled on NB 2004.  Of the 44 patients that went through tandem transplant, 36 (82%) remain event-free after median follow-up of 3 years (14-72 months) with probability of 5 year overall and event-free survival determined to be 68% ± 20%  and 67% ±  16%, with no treatment-related deaths.  Another report from the same center in 2007 gave results of 52 children diagnosed from 1997 to 2005 (44 had second SCT with TBI).  That study had 15% treatment-related deaths, 33 (75%) were event-free with median follow-up of 53 months (19-117 mo) from diagnosis.[2]  A retrospective study of 141 patients enrolled 2000 to 2005 from the Korean Society of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology (KSPHO) published May 2010 also showed improved 5-year event-free survival in the tandem group over the single transplant group (51 ±12% vs. 31 ±12%, P=0.030).[3]

Korean single and tandem retrospective study 1997 to 2005

These studies show strikingly comparable results to a larger COG pilot (97 children diagnosed 1994 to 2002) reported in 2006, which was the rationale for the current frontline single-versus-tandem trial in the COG.[4]

Germans report no difference in outcome using cis-retinoic acid (Accutane) or ch14.18/CHO antibody

POC37 (p. 210) Comparison of anti-GD2-antibody ch14.18 and 13-cis-retinoic acid as consolidation therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma. Results of the German NB97 trial

Thorsten Simon and group from GPOH (German pediatric oncology study group) reported retrospectively on two similar—but not randomized groups—showing that the outcome was not statistically different with almost 8 years of median follow-up for 74 children who received only ch14.18 antibody (1997-2002) and 75 children who received only cis-retinoic acid (2002-2004). The 3-year event-free survival from diagnosis was 53% ± 6% and 51% ± 6% (p=.209) respectively. While this result is interesting with regard to single-agent efficacy, it is very important to note that none of the children received both antibodies and cis-retinoic acid, nor were the children given cytokines (IL2 or GM-CSF) with the antibody as in the current COG trial. The GPOH previously reported no advantage to ch14.18 (no cytokines) over oral maintenance chemotherapy.[5]  But at ANR 2008 (Japan) the GPOH group reported no late relapses in the ch14.18 group. At this 2010 ANR they also said they have now seen a difference in the retrospective study after 10 years with statistically significant improved survival for the ch14.18 group. During the Special Clinical Session at ANR on Tuesday Dr Thorsten Simon said the GPOH will be revisiting the question of ch14.18/CHO given the remarkable survival advantage shown in the COG study report from Mar 2009.[6]  They are now considering using subcutaneous administration of IL2 to reduce toxicity (as is SIOP in the UK and the rest of Europe), and exploring the use of other agents such as IL15 or lenalidomide with the antibody.

References

  1. J Clin Oncol 28:15s, 2010 (suppl; abstr 9516)
  2. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007 Jul;40(1):37-45. Epub 2007 Apr 30. PMID 17468771
  3. J Korean Med Sci. 2010 May;25(5):691-7. Epub 2010 Apr 21. PMID 20436703 [full text]
  4. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 20;24(18):2891-6. PMID: 16782928 [full text]
  5. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Sep 1;22(17):3549-57. PMID: 15337804
  6. J Clin Oncol 27:15s, 2009 (suppl; abstr 10067z)

Leave a Comment

This site is protected by WP-CopyRightPro