AACR 2011: A new antibody approach for neuroblastoma?

Anti-ALK antibody explored at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia

An increasingly important research topic in neuroblastoma focuses on anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutation or expression. At AACR there were 8 presentations on ALK and NB. While efforts are ongoing to better target the ~7% of NB cases that have an ALK mutation, now there is also compelling research on the ALK protein expression which is found in 90% of NB cases. ALK expression is found in some cancers (primary lymphoma) and is detected using monoclonal antibodies. In normal tissues, ALK protein is expressed in only a few cells within the developing and mature nervous system (glial cells, neurons, endothelial cells and pericytes).[1]

Dr Max van Noesel from Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands presented interesting data showing that the percent of NB cells in a tumor sample that are positive for ALK protein expression correlate with outcome and risk stratification. His team examined 71 NB cases (all risk categories) for ALK expression, and found that tumor samples that showed 75-100% positive cells for ALK expression had the worst outcome,  and that response to the ALK inhibitor TAE684 was dependent on higher ALK expression. Tumors with ALK mutation had higher ALK protein expression and responded better to in vitro testing of the ALK inhibitor.[2]

Meanwhile, Dr Erica Carpenter, a researcher in Dr Yael Mosse’s lab at CHOP, examined targeting NB cells with anti-ALK antibody. Given that the worst NBs express the ALK protein, this is a compelling idea for several reasons. Although this work is still in early preclinical stage, researchers will be seeking to answer many questions including– could this antibody strategy be more effective than anti-GD2 antibodies? Could this therapy present less toxicity?

Dr Carpenter also explored the combination of anti-ALK antibody with the ALK inhibitor PF-02341066 in NB cell lines, and found that the combination is more effective than either agent alone because the ALK inhibitor drives up ALK protein expression on the NB cell surface:

Therefore, we hypothesized that antibody targeting of ALK in neuroblastoma was a therapeutically appropriate strategy. To first confirm the potential of anti-ALK antibody-mediated immunotherapy, we used in vitro assays to demonstrate enhanced immune-cell induced cytotoxicity of antibody-treated human neuroblastoma-derived cell lines. We next showed that in vitro antibody treatment of neuroblastoma cell lines expressing activated ALK led to growth inhibition and cell death. These effects were enhanced by treatment with PF-02341066, an orally available small-molecule inhibitor of the ALK tyrosine kinase. To identify the mechanism behind this enhanced combined effect, we used flow cytometry to show that PF-02341066 sensitizes cells to antibody treatment by inducing accumulation of cell-surface ALK, thus increasing the accessibility of antigen for antibody binding. Finally, to further predict in vivo cytotoxic mechanisms of dual ALK targeting, we used flow cytometry to demonstrate enhanced apoptosis and proliferation inhibition resulting from combined antibody and inhibitor treatment as compared to either drug alone.[3]

The next step in this exciting project is developing a clinical grade antibody, which is underway, and after further preclinical testing, the agent will be ready for clinical trials.

References

  1. http://www.nordiqc.org/Epitopes/ALK1/ALK1.htm
  2. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) expression is an independent prognostic factor in neuroblastoma patients and correlates well with ALK inhibitor response in vitro
  3. Antibody targeting of anaplastic lymphoma kinase induces cytotoxicity of human neuroblastoma
 


 

 

 

 


Comments (2)

SIOP 2010 ~ Neuroblastoma oral paper presented on poor prognostic features

The neuroblastoma oral papers (OP2) presented on Friday October 22, 2010 at SIOP in Boston covered a range of topics including prognostic factors, targets, and stem cell contamination. This report will focus on the presentation on prognostic significance of segmental alterations in neuroblastoma tumors.

Accumulation of segmental alterations determines progression in neuroblastoma (O024)

Neuroblastoma tumor biology has long been an intense subject of study because of the heterogeneous nature of this disease. Looking at macro, micro, and genetic features reveals the differences in tumors, and why some children with neuroblastoma survive without treatment and others do poorly with the most intense treatments conceived. Now that technology is accessible to analyze genetic profiles, more precise risk can be assigned, and appropriate treatment given. Further, this analysis allows for understanding the evolution of tumor genetics as relapse and progression occurs.

Gudrun Schleiermacher from France presented on a study of numerical and segmental chromosome alterations in neuroblastoma tumors. This subject was a matter of interest at ANR in Stockholm as well, and this abstract was also presented at ASCO in June.[1]  This topic has been the subject of many abstracts at recent meetings, and several recent publications confirm the importance of this work [2-6].

Prior publication in 2009 from this French group included  a comprehensive overview of the genetic alterations of neuroblastoma and clinical significance. A series of 493 neuroblastoma samples was investigated by array-based comparative genomic hybridization and the analysis identified several types of profiles:

Tumors presenting exclusively whole-chromosome copy number variations were associated with excellent survival. No disease-related death was observed in this group. In contrast, tumors with any type of segmental chromosome alterations characterized patients with a high risk of relapse. The analysis of the overall genomic pattern, which probably unravels particular genomic instability mechanisms rather than the analysis of individual markers, is essential to predict relapse in NB patients. It adds critical prognostic information to conventional markers and should be included in future treatment stratification.[2]

Caren and collegues (Sweden) also concurred that these studies have:

implications for therapy in different risk groups and stresses that genome-wide microarray analyses should be included in clinical management to fully evaluate risk, aid diagnosis, and guide treatment. [5]

Schleiermacher and colleagues analyzed 394 neuroblastoma tumors with array-based comparative genomic hybridization and linked the results to clinical data for outcomes. The tumor samples included all risk groups, and analysis was performed again in the event of relapse to discover changes in the tumor profile. The study confirmed that neuroblastoma tumors are characterized by two distinct genetic profiles — either numerical or segmental chromosome alterations.

Tumors were first divided into five groups based on genomic aberrations: numerical only, segmental only, MYCN amplified, numerical and segmental, MYCN and numerical. The tumors with only numerical alterations had the best prognosis. No breakpoint pattern was observed in the segmental-only group which contained up to 1000 breakpoints. Seven or more breakpoints portended a worse prognosis, and was an independent factor in multivariate analysis. More breakpoints were correlated with higher age at diagnosis, higher stage of disease, and higher risk of relapse.

Tumors with only numerical alterations at diagnosis frequently acquired segmental alterations upon relapse. This could not be strictly attributed to chemotherapy since tumors treated with surgery only had acquired segmental aberrations. The authors concluded that tumor progression is directly linked to an accumulation of segmental alterations.

References

1. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 1;28(19):3122-30. Epub 2010 Jun 1. Accumulation of Segmental Alterations Determines Progression in Neuroblastoma. PMID: 20516441

2. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 1;27(7):1026-33. Epub 2009 Jan 26.  Overall genomic pattern is a predictor of outcome in neuroblastoma. PMID: 19171713

3. British Journal of Cancer (2007) 97, 238–246.  Chromosomal CGH identifies patients with a higher risk of relapse in neuroblastoma without MYCN amplification. [free fulltext]

4. Am J Pathol. 2010 Jun;176(6):2616-25. Epub 2010 Apr 15. 2p24 Gain region harboring MYCN gene compared with MYCN amplified and nonamplified neuroblastoma: biological and clinical characteristics. PMID: 20395439

5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 2;107(9):4323-8. Epub 2010 Feb 9.  High-risk neuroblastoma tumors with 11q-deletion display a poor prognostic, chromosome instability phenotype with later onset. [free fulltext]

6. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:2243-2253.  Chromosome 1p and 11q Deletions and Outcome in Neuroblastoma. [free fulltext]

Travel to this meeting was supported by:

.

.

Leave a Comment

ANR 2010: International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Update

INRG Task Force

In 1988 an international task force was formed to standardize the risk group classification for neuroblastoma. The reason this is so important is because international studies could not be compared to each other with different patient cohorts. One “high risk” study might actually include children considered to be intermediate risk by another group, and the outcomes reported may consequently look “better.”

Today there are 64 investigators in the INRG task force which includes North America, Australia, Europe, and Japan. A consensus for a pre-treatment risk assignment has been accomplished, which includes image-defined risk factors (IDRFs) for staging. This believed to be more reproducible with radiologists.

A database of 8800 children diagnosed between 1990 and 2002 was used to characterize the new risk assignment scheme. In all of these children, the EFS was 63% ± 1% for all risk groups. The percentage of children in each risk group for the entire database breaks down to:

  • 28% were very low risk
  • 26% were low risk
  • 9% were intermediate risk
  • 36% were high risk

So far there have been many studies and reports using this data set.  Any investigator is invited to submit a bid for the use of the database analysis.

The most significant changes in risk assignment from this work is using IDRFs and including 11q status.

The challenge now is to incorporate and analyze approximately 4000 more children diagnosed since 2004 and added to the database.  This brings the total to over 16,000. New data items included are gender, ethnicity, therapy, and other causes of death.

A web-based interactive INRG database network has been proposed, and the goal is to collect biological data, phenotype, clinical outcome, and have tumor samples available for further analysis. A question for the future: will clinical features be abandoned and only genetic features used to classify risk assignment? This could allow for tweaking frontline therapy for children who have genetic aberrations predicting poor response to a particular therapy.

Clearly, this ambitious project will continue to offer a rich source of data to better predict outcomes and required therapy for children with neuroblastoma.

References:

Criteria for evaluation of disease extent by (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scans in neuroblastoma: a report for the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Task Force. Matthay KK, Shulkin B, Ladenstein R, Michon J, Giammarile F, Lewington V, Pearson AD, Cohn SL. Br J Cancer. 2010 Apr 27;102(9):1319-26. Review.PMID: 20424613

International consensus for neuroblastoma molecular diagnostics: report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Biology Committee. Ambros PF, Ambros IM, Brodeur GM, Haber M, Khan J, Nakagawara A, Schleiermacher G, Speleman F, Spitz R, London WB, Cohn SL, Pearson AD, Maris JM. Br J Cancer. 2009 May 5;100(9):1471-82.PMID: 19401703

Consensus criteria for sensitive detection of minimal neuroblastoma cells in bone marrow, blood and stem cell preparations by immunocytology and QRT-PCR: recommendations by the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Task Force. Beiske K, Burchill SA, Cheung IY, Hiyama E, Seeger RC, Cohn SL, Pearson AD, Matthay KK; International neuroblastoma Risk Group Task Force. Br J Cancer. 2009 May 19;100(10):1627-37. Epub 2009 Apr 28.PMID: 19401690

The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) staging system: an INRG Task Force report. Monclair T, Brodeur GM, Ambros PF, Brisse HJ, Cecchetto G, Holmes K, Kaneko M, London WB, Matthay KK, Nuchtern JG, von Schweinitz D, Simon T, Cohn SL, Pearson AD; INRG Task Force. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 10;27(2):298-303. Epub 2008 Dec 1.PMID: 19047290

Leave a Comment

This site is protected by WP-CopyRightPro