The Story of the Band of Parents and humanized 3F8

by Caryn Franca and Shirley Staples

It was summer of 2007.  A group of parents had asked Dr. Nai-Kong Cheung to meet and update them on new treatments for neuroblastoma at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.  Most had children with relapsed neuroblastoma; all knew the terrible odds.  Dr. Cheung, head of the neuroblastoma program at MSKCC, and a long-time proponent of antibody therapy, met with the group at Ronald McDonald House.  After the presentation, one dad posed a question.  “What,” he asked, “do you need, to give our children more treatment options?”   “Money” was the simple, yet daunting answer.

Dr. Cheung then described an important research goal—the development of a new, humanized form of the 3F8 antibody that had been used since 1986 to treat neuroblastoma at MSKCC.  Researchers believed the new version, “Hu3F8,” had the potential to be many times more effective in fighting neuroblastoma, but Dr. Cheung estimated that $2-3 million dollars would be needed to fund the development of the drug.  After the meeting, parents excitedly discussed this revelation. The consensus was that they could and would do whatever was necessary to make hu3F8 treatment a reality.  A crusade was born.

Within a matter of days, an online group had been created and parents had begun brainstorming.  The name of the new parent group came from a California dad:  the “Band of Parents.”  One group of parents began the discussions and eventually the legal steps to form a tax-exempt foundation. Seven dads began planning to bike across the United States to raise funds and awareness–a ride they called “The Loneliest Road” to reflect the daily challenges facing neuroblastoma families. Ultimately they raised over $200,000 for hu3F8. Soon there were 60 families in the “BOP,” and the energy was palpable, from garage and jewelry sales, to writing fundraising letters to friends, to telling individual stories to local newspaper reporters.

Donations began to pour in, some from as far away as the Middle East.  As December approached, a New York City mom conceived the idea of a massive bake sale of holiday cookies.  Over several weeks, parents, friends, and volunteers from the culinary world baked, packaged and shipped 96,000 cookies from a small rented kitchen, raising several hundred thousand dollars. A few months later, families in Virginia banded together to organize the “Rock’n for a Cure.”  Band of Parent funds were mounting.

The efforts that followed were too many and varied to detail, but the key phrase is “banded together” – parents of children with neuroblastoma, along with family, friends and perfect strangers, came together to raise the funds needed to create a new treatment option for children with neuroblastoma.  Great personal determination was required.  As the months passed, many Band of Parents members lost their child to neuroblastoma – including the parent who coined the name “Band of Parents,” the mother who conceived the cookie bake-off, three of the bikers on The Loneliest Road, and the first three presidents of the BOP.  However, parents pushed forward despite the grief and loss felt by all in the group.  Golf tournaments, yard sales, and concerts were organized, sometimes from hospital bedsides; holiday decorations, tee-shirts, and greeting cards were designed and sold.  Last but not least, the dedicated neuroblastoma team at MSKCC cleared the regulatory and many other hurdles to taking a new drug from the laboratory to the clinic.

In August 2011 the day finally arrived that so many had worked for and dreamed of.  A new phase 1 trial of hu3F8, a drug specifically designed for the treatment of neuroblastoma, opened at Memorial Sloan-Kettering, and the very first child received the promising new treatment. Ordinary people had accomplished an extraordinary labor of love. For all those involved, this will be remembered as a time when it was shown that, by banding together, a group of parents could give new hope in the battle against an aggressive childhood cancer.  Today, the members of the Band of Parents are still working to raise awareness and funding for research, so that someday no child will suffer from the terrible disease of neuroblastoma.

Editors note: the trial opened in August 2011 and is listed here: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01419834

The trial allows for relapsed or refractory NB with evidence of disease, and is given without cytokines IL2 or GM-CSF.

New phase I trial opening soon at University of Alabama, Birmingham

This trial will enroll 6 patients at 2 dose levels for IL2 given with fixed dose of zoledronic acid. Zoledronic acid will be given IV once every 3 weeks, and daily subcutaneous IL2 given weekdays for 2 weeks.

Patients must have evidence of disease and have not received prior antibody therapy with IL2.

See NIH listing for rationale:

To further explore means of harnessing the immune system to attack NB, the investigators are studying the combination of zoledronic acid (ZOL) and interleukin-2 (IL-2). ZOL has been demonstrated to have direct anti-neuroblastoma effects in laboratory studies. ZOL also augments the production of tumor killing white blood cells called gamma-delta T cells. When used in combination with IL-2, ZOL is capable of eliciting potent anti-cancer effects in patients, in part, via the expansion of gamma-delta T cells. In this present trial the investigators aim to study the tolerability of the combination of ZOL and IL-2 in pediatric NB patients. Patients will also be monitored radiologically for tumor response to therapy. Correlative biological studies will study the ability of this drug combination to elicit the production of NB killing gamma-delta T cells in children.

Joseph Pressey, MD
Assistant Professor of Pediatrics at University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Director, Experimental Therapeutics Program

Dr. Pressey is a graduate of the University of Georgia and the Medical College of Georgia. After completing his pediatric residency at the Children’s Hospital Medical Center in Cincinnati, he trained in pediatric hematology-oncology at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.  Dr. Pressey’s primary clinical interest is in the treatment of pediatric solid tumors, with a particular focus on pediatric sarcomas.  He serves as UAB’s principal investigator for the Children’s Oncology Group Phase I developmental therapeutics program and the Sarcoma Alliance for Research Through Collaboration (SARC) consortium.  Through these organizations, Dr. Pressey is interested in providing patients with access to cutting edge therapies for all types of relapsed and refractory cancers.  Dr. Pressey’s primary research interest is the biology and treatment of sarcomas. Working with others at UAB, he is studying pediatric tumors with the intent of finding more effective and tolerable therapies.  

The American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) is the oldest and largest scientific organization in the world focused on every facet of cancer research. AACR was founded in 1907 by 11 physicians and scientists interested in research with the goal to “to further the investigation and spread the knowledge of cancer.” Since then, the AACR has grown to 33,000 members and publishes seven peer-reviewed journals: Cancer Research; Clinical Cancer Research; Molecular Cancer Therapeutics; Molecular Cancer Research; Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention; and Cancer Prevention Research, and launched a new journal in 2010, Cancer Discovery.

AACR’s mission is to accelerates progress toward the prevention and cure of cancer by promoting research, education, communication, and collaboration.

The 102nd Annual Meeting 2011 begins April 2 in Orlando FL and will feature over 6000 abstracts presented by basic science, translational, and clinical researchers. Over 17,000 attendees and presenters will learn in a variety of settings: plenary lectures, symposia, minisymposia, workshops, poster sessions, and other formats.

A selection of neuroblastoma-related presentations

Several presentations and posters on neuroblastoma are of interest. Click on the title to see the abstract on AACR site.

4336/4 – Oncolytic reovirus as a novel therapy for neuroblastoma Amelia Kellar, Nicole Redding, Karen Blote, Qiao Shi, Jason Spurrell, Paul Beaudry, Don Morris. University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada Poster Session

4340/8 – Sorafenib induces growth arrest and apoptosis in neuroblastoma cells via inhibition of JAK2/STAT3 and MEK1/2/MAPK (p44/42) signaling pathways Fan Yang¹, Veronica Jove¹, Ralf Buettner¹, Hong Xin¹, Sangkil Nam¹, Tasnim Ara², Yves A. DeClerck², Robert C. Seeger², Hua Yu¹, Richard Jove¹. ¹City of Hope, Duarte, CA; ²The Saban Research Institute of Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA Poster Session

4346/14 – Differential response of a novel protein kinase C-iota inhibitor (ICA-1) on neuroblastoma cells Prajit P. Pillai, Mildred Acevedo-Duncan. Univ. of South Florida, Tampa, FL Poster Session

954 – ABCC/MRP multidrug transporters contribute to neuroblastoma biology, pathogenesis and clinical outcome, independently of any role in cytotoxic drug efflux Murray D. Norris¹, Michelle J. Henderson¹, Antonio Porro², Marcia Munoz¹, Nunzio Iraci², Chengyuan Xue¹, Jayne Murray¹, Claudia Flemming¹, Jamie Fletcher¹, Samuele Gherardi², Alan Kwek¹, Amanda Russell¹, Wendy B. London³, Allen B. Buxton³, Lesley Ashton¹, Alan C. Sartorelli⁴, Susan L. Cohn⁵, Manfred Schwab⁶, Glenn M. Marshall¹, Giovanni Perini², Michelle Haber¹. ¹Children’s Cancer Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia; ²University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; ³University of Florida and Children’s Oncology Group Statistics and Data Center, Gainesville, FL; ⁴Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; ⁵University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; ⁶German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany Minisymposium

4758 – Inhibition of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) as a potential therapeutic for pediatric neuroblastoma Mike R. Russell, Kristina A. Cole, John M. Maris. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA Minisymposium

LB-312/3 – Methylated RASSF1a is the first specific DNA marker for minimal residual disease testing in neuroblastoma Janine Stutterheim, Fatima Ait Ichou, Emmy Den Ouden, Rogier Versteeg, Huib N. Caron, Godelieve A.M. Tytgat, C. Ellen Van der Schoot. Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

4563/5 – Antibody targeting of anaplastic lymphoma kinase induces cytotoxicity of human neuroblastoma Erica L. Carpenter¹, Elizabeth A. Haglund¹, Adrian K. Chow¹, Andrew C. Wood¹, Lili T. Belcastro¹, James G. Christensen², Marc Vigny³, John M. Maris¹, Mark A. Lemmon⁴, Yael P. Mosse¹. ¹Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; ²Pfizer Global Research and Development, La Jolla, CA; ³INSERM, Paris, France; ⁴University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA Poster Session

LB-366/11 – Patient-derived EBV-immortalized B-lymphocytes are a dominant contaminant of in vitro cultured human neuroblastoma tumor-initiating cells isolated from bone marrow. Sven Påhlman, Sofie A. Johnsson, Alexander Pietras, Caroline Wigerup, Ingrid Øra, Michael Andäng, Kenneth Nilsson, Tor Olofsson, David Gisselsson. Lund Univ., Malmö, Sweden, Lund Univ., Lund, Sweden, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, Uppsala Univ., Uppsala, Sweden Late-Breaking Poster Session

742/26 – Mechanisms of resistance to small molecule inhibition of anaplastic lymphoma kinase in human neuroblastoma Erica L. Carpenter¹, Elizabeth A. Haglund¹, Adrian K. Chow¹, James G. Christensen², John M. Maris¹, Yael P. Mosse¹. ¹Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; ²Pfizer Global Research and Development, La Jolla, CA Poster Session

3942/29 – A pilot trial testing the feasibility of using molecular-guided therapy in patients with refractory or recurrent neuroblastoma Giselle L. Saulnier Sholler¹, Javed Kahn², William Ferguson³, Genvieve Bergendahl¹, Erika Currier¹, Shannon Lenox¹, Jeffrey Bond¹, William Roberts⁴, Deanna Mitchell⁵, Don Eslin⁶, Jacqueline Kraveka⁷, Joel Kaplan⁸, Nehal Parikh⁹, Suman Malempati¹⁰, Gina Hanna¹¹, Barton Kamen¹², Craig Webb¹³. ¹University of Vermont, Burlington, VT; ²National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD; ³St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; ⁴University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA; ⁵Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI; ⁶MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando, Orlando, FL; ⁷Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; ⁸Levine Children’s Hospital, Charlotte, NC; ⁹Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Hartford, CT; ¹⁰Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; ¹¹Inova Fairfax Hospital for Children and Women, Falls Church, VA; ¹²Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; ¹³Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI Poster Session

1558/6 – Paracrine signaling through Mycn enhances tumor-vascular microenvironment in neuroblastoma Yvan H. Chanthery, W. Clay Gustafson, William A. Weiss. UCSF, San Francisco, CA Poster Session

4350/18 – Translating diagnostic gene expression profiles for pediatric solid tumors Daniel H. Wai¹, Michele R. Wing², Kelley Kneile², Yvonne Moyer², Jonathan D. Buckley³, Robert C. Seeger⁴, Douglas S. Hawkins⁵, Stephen X. Skapek⁶, Timothy J. Triche⁴. ¹Center for Personalized Medicine, Los Angeles, CA; ²The Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH; ³University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; ⁴Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; ⁵Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA; ⁶University of Chicago, Chicago, IL Poster Session

5237/25 – Development of organ-selective neuroblastoma cell lines to identify genes mediating bone marrow and liver colonization Zillan Neiron¹, Kacper Jankowski¹, Jayne Murray¹, Sophia Champion², Murray D. Norris¹, Michelle Haber¹, Jamie I. Fletcher¹. ¹Children’s Cancer Institute Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia; ²University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia Poster Session

130/14 – MiR-204 acts as a tumor suppressor in neuroblastoma through down-regulation of the neurotrophic receptor TrkB Jacqueline M. Ryan¹, Amanda Tivnan¹, Isabella Bray¹, Joanna Fay¹, Andrew M. Davidoff², Lorraine Tracey², Raymond Stallings¹. ¹Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland & National Children’s Research Centre, Dublin, Ireland; ²St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN Poster Session

4685 – Mechanistic guidance of ALK inhibition for the treatment of neuroblastoma Scott C. Bresler¹, Andrew Wood², Elizabeth Haglund², James Christensen³, John M. Maris², Mark A. Lemmon¹, Yael P. Mosse². ¹University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; ²Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; ³Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, CA Minisymposium

1808/28 – Neuroblastoma cell lines established from progressive disease that exhibit partial or multi drug resistance are highly sensitive to chimeric receptor scFv(ch14.18)-zeta mediated NK cell killing Diana Seidel¹, Anastasia Shibina², C. Patrick Reynolds², Winfried S. Wels³, Holger N. Lode¹, Nicole Huebener¹. ¹University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany; ²Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX; ³Chemotherapeutisches Forschungsinstitut, Georg-Speyer-Haus, Frankfurt, Germany Poster Session

508/4 – Signal transduction and activator of transcription (STAT) 3 is necessary for environment-mediated drug resistance Tasnim Ara¹, Rie Nakata¹, Hiroyuki Shimada¹, Ralf Buettner², Robert C. Seeger¹, Hua Yu², Richard Jove², Yves A. DeClerck¹. ¹USC/Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; ²Beckman Research Institute/City of Hope, Duarte, CA Poster Session

926 – Whole genome and transcriptome sequencing defines the spectrum of somatic changes in high-risk neuroblastoma Olena Morozova¹, Inanc Birol¹, Richard Corbett¹, Karen Mungall¹, Edward F. Attiyeh², Shahab Asgharzadeh³, Yongjun Zhao¹, Richard A. Moore¹, Martin Hirst¹, Steven Jones¹, Michael D. Hogarty², Sharon Diskin², Yael P. Mosse², Maura Diamond², Richard Sposto³, Lingyun Ji³, Daniela S. Gerhard⁴, Malcolm A. Smith⁴, Javed Khan⁴, Robert C. Seeger³, Marco A. Marra⁵, John M. Maris², the NCI TARGET Initiative. ¹Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; ²Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; ³Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; ⁴National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; ⁵Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency and Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada Minisymposium

1800/20 – 4-HPR (fenretinide) sensitizes human neuroblastoma cells for antibody-independent and ch14.18-mediated NK cell killing Anastasia Shibina¹, Diana Seidel², Srinivas Somanchi³, Holger N. Lode², Dean A. Lee³, C.Patrick Reynolds¹, Nicole Huebener². ¹Texas Tech Univ. Health Sciences Ctr., Lubbock, TX; ²University Medicine Greifswald, Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Greifswald, Germany; ³The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX Poster Session

1423/15 – Effects of DFMO-based combination therapy in advanced stage neuroblastoma Dana-Lynn T. Koomoa, Ingo Lange, Andre S. Bachmann. University of Hawaii, College of Pharmacy, Hilo, HI Poster Session

TARGET Project Team Highlights: Neuroblastoma Javed Khan. National Insts. of Health, Bethesda, MD NCI/NIH-Sponsored Session

NIH15. The NCI Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) Initiative: Using Large-Scale Genomics to Identify Novel Therapeutic Targets for Childhood Cancers

Towards a personalized approach to pediatric cancer management: Neuroblastoma as an example John M. Maris. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA Major Symposium
Recent Findings from Genomic Analyses of Tumors

5359/30 – Cytotoxicity of MLN8237 and SAHA in pediatric cancer cell lines Jodi Muscal¹, Kathy Scorsone¹, Jeffrey Ecsedy², Stacey Berg¹. ¹Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; ²Millenium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA Poster Session

4756 – Exome sequencing of 81 neuroblastomas identifies a wide diversity of somatic mutation Trevor J. Pugh¹, Michael Lawrence¹, Carrie Sougnez¹, Gad Getz¹, Edward Attiyeh², Michael Hogarty², Sharon Diskin², Mosse Yael², Maura Diamond², Shahab Asgharzadeh³, Richard Sposto³, Jun S. Wei⁴, Thomas Badgett⁴, Wendy B. London⁵, Julie Gastier-Foster⁶, Malcolm A. Smith⁴, Daniela S. Gerhard⁴, Robert Seeger³, Javed Khan⁴, Matthew L. Meyerson¹, John M. Maris², NCI Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) Initiative. ¹The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA; ²Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; ³Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; ⁴National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; ⁵Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Children’s Oncology Group Statistic and Data Center, Boston, MA; ⁶Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH Minisymposium

Overview of environment: Mediated drug resistance Yves A. DeClerck. USC/Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA Educational Session

Many therapies, robust rationale needed

For years I have (obsessively) tracked clinical trials and therapies available to children with relapsed and refractory neuroblastoma, driven by hope that curing relapsed NB is possible. Since there are many therapies for “unspecified solid tumors” as well as specifically for neuroblastoma, the resulting variety of trials is quite astounding.

I started tracking these trials for possibilities for my son, discussing with other astute parents, and watching and praying for responses in their children to new treatments. I searched for meeting abstracts for unpublished results, and scrutinized the published results of trials. Between the heterogeneity of the disease and the varied treatment paths of each child the comprehensive study of effective relapse therapies is nearly impossible.

A parent naturally wants to know what options are available when their child is fighting for survival–but far more critical is knowing which option to choose at a given point in time. Finding all the options is conceivable, but determining the best possible option is a completely different problem. The question “What is available?” is easy to answer. The question “What should we do?” is not easy to answer.

In part, this activity led to a bigger project. Several volunteers (about 30 in all) worked on a “NB Parent Handbook” during the period 2006 – 2008 for Children’s Neuroblastoma Cancer Foundation. The entire book (220 pages) can be found on the CNCF site at cncfhope.org. The project is ongoing–new chapters are being added and material is being updated. I am currently updating the relapse chapter.

My purpose in posting this update on relapse treatment is two-fold:

1 – draw attention to the Handbook project and attract more help

2 – generate some dialogue concerning the question of relapse therapy — is a “rational” approach even possible?

Approach to relapse therapy differs widely from one study group to another, and one institution to another. There are no firm rules or universal recommendations, although one study group has recently recommended a very general plan for NB relapse treatment using salvage chemotherapy and MIBG only.  Much depends on the experience of the treating oncologist, careful consideration of the child’s history and status, and trials that may be open and accruing at the local institution.

What makes this landscape so incredibly complex is that there are many options, but the options are spread far and wide. Once a parent begins to consider options at a distant facility, the close oversight of the oncologist most familiar with the child is often jeopardized, and the parents have to make choices based on limited information.

It is impossible to describe just how terrifying and overwhelming it is for a parent to walk away from a child’s trusted primary oncologist and the loyalty developed for the home hospital, into the unknown. An unintended but serious consequence is the risk of the parent assuming full responsibility for the outcome–especially when things do not go well.

“Of all the treatments available, what is best for my child at this point in time?”

Think about how difficult this is to answer. The primary oncologist has a limited set of treatments to offer, and limited experience with treatments that are not offered at the home hospital. This creates a difficulty for the parents when they look beyond the confines of the home hospital, and strive to understand the potential for treatments available elsewhere. What we need is an oncologist who is familiar with every treatment and intimately knows the patient, and can recommend the best course of action in a thoroughly objective manner. But the reality is — that is asking too much — no oncologist has the time to scrutinize 50 or 100 open trials in addition to many off-the-shelf therapies to determine the best fit for a particular child. There is no incentive to send patients away, either.

So what is the solution? Is there a solution? I don’t know. That is why I am asking for feedback.

The medical community recognizes that there is a role in this arena for patient advocates. However, the patient advocate role presents a grave quandary — the advocate may be trusted for lack of any agenda other than concern for a child’s life, but the patient advocate is not a doctor and not qualified to recommend any treatment decisions.

Your feedback, thoughts, ideas, concerns, and brainstorms are greatly appreciated. What if you had a comprehensive list of every treatment possible, right now. How would you chose the best treatment for a given situation? What would help you the most? What do you think?

An outline of the of the draft follows — see the CNCF website for the full chapter (pages 113- 123).

Dealing with Relapse — draft outline

(treatments discussed are being updated now)

Beginning Relapse Treatment.

Relapse Treatment Rationale

Your doctor will take into consideration many factors when recommending treatment for relapse:

• Age of child
• How long the child was in remission after treatment
• Where disease is located
• How much disease (tumor burden)
• Rate of tumor growth
• Prior treatment history
• Organ function
• Available stem cells
• Changing characteristics of the child’s NB, or new information
• Goals of treatment

Treatments for relapse vary in approach and intensity.

Can we know what will actually work against my child’s NB?

• High-dose chemo/radiation.
• Medium-dose chemo.
• Low-dose chemo.
• Targeted drugs (“small molecules”) and biologics.
• Immunological treatments – antibodies.
• Immunological treatments – vaccines and viruses.

Second remission treatment issues.

Special issues with late relapse.

Maximizing your child’s treatment options is an important part of the relapse decision process.

Weighing quality of life and other considerations.

Investigating doctors and clinical trials.

It is common for children to see one or more of the following treatment categories during the battle against relapse:

• Enrollment on phase I or II clinical trials. These may be specific to NB or for unspecified solid tumors. Phase III studies are rare for relapsed pediatric tumors including NB.
• Treatment “per” a clinical trial protocol although not enrolled, if not eligible and drugs are already FDA approved.
• Treatment with “off the shelf” agents that are FDA approved.
• Treatment on a “compassionate use” basis with drugs not yet FDA approved.

Phase I and Phase II distinctions.

Timing of entry.

Interpreting “response” from study reports.

Risks and benefits of treatment.

SUMMARY

The rigors of relapse treatment cannot be minimized. You may be consulting with new and different doctors, traveling far from home for your child’s treatment on various clinical trials, weighing difficult quality of life issues for your family, and at times making treatment decisions based on a leap of faith. An oncologist with experience in treating relapsed NB, and equally importantly, someone you feel comfortable with and can communicate with effectively, is the key resource in making your treatment decisions. However, the more informed you are, the more comfortable you will feel that you have made the best possible choices for your child.

There are successes in relapse situations.  Unfortunately, because the relapse population involves such variation in relapse sites, in amount of disease, types of treatments tried, multiple treatment centers, and many other variables, it is virtually impossible to report long-term survival statistics. Even so, the reports of long-term survivors in some studies, the increasing numbers and approaches of available treatments, and the anecdotal evidence — all suggest that the prospect for long survivorship after relapse is improving.  There is increasing hope for relapsed children, and having an NB team who expresses and shares your hope is also essential to this stage of the battle.

Presentations with implications for neuroblastoma

Antiangiogentic agents

Rakesh Jain, Raghu Kalluri, and Marsha Moses talked about angiogenesis and why metastases are promoted when giving antiangiogenetic agents. The agents create hypoxia in the tumor and an interesting series of experiments they performed support the theory that hypoxia drives metastases. Candidate biomarkers have been proposed SDF1-alpha and receptor CXCR4 to help determine which patients may benefit from antiangiogenetic agents and who should not get these agents. In the second presentation they showed a model of how they induced metastases in mice – providing a better understanding of mechanism so it can be blocked. They can induce metastases with both hypoxia-dependent mechanism and hypoxia-independent mechanism.

Validation of survivin as target

Fieke Lamers (Netherlands) gave an interesting presentation on validation of survivin as therapeutic target. They have a drug YM155 by Astellas pharmaceuticals that suppresses survivin, which is highly expressed in most neuroblastomas. They had 24 NB cell lines, some were resistant to YM155 and they found that cyclosporin will sensitize NB lines that show MDR1 resistance to YM155, and then NB will undergo apoptosis in presence of YM155.

Neuroblastoma bits from November 2010

.

NCI featured article on ALK inhibitor Crizotinib

While encouraging responses are being seen in lung cancer patients with ALK mutation, drug resistance is expected to be a problem.

Crizotinib Continues to Show Promise for Some Lung Tumors, Faces Challenge of Drug Resistance

.

FDA discusses Crizotinib pediatric trial design

Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) Nov 30, 2010

“If the current COG Phase I/II studies evaluating crizotinib in refractory pediatric solid tumors or ALCL shows promising activity in neuroblastoma, should crizotinib be evaluated in the post-transplant relapsed/refractory setting or should a randomized trial in a less heavily treated population be considered? If the former population (i.e., post-transplant relapsed or refractory) is a more appropriate setting, please discuss whether Progression Free Survival (PFS) is an adequate endpoint.”

Committee discussion questions

.

Insight Genetics Awarded Qualifying Therapeutic Discovery Program Grant

.

http://www.eurojournals.com/ejsr_40_1_15.pdf

www.eurojournals.com

.

Scientific American describes the recent advances in viruses that kill cancer — now available to children this year for the first time –

Cancer Therapy Goes Viral: Progress Is Made Tackling Tumors with Viruses: Scientific American

“A new generation of oncolytic viruses are entering late-stage clinical trials, repurposing smallpox and herpesvirus to take on tough tumors.”

.

Search goes on for toxins to kill neuroblastoma

“Luesch is experimenting with toxins—drawn from several species of cyanobacteria—on several types of cancer, including neuroblastoma, a childhood disease that attacks nerve cells. In July 2009, he launched a four-year, $1.2 million NCI-funded study, part of which entails… largazole testing on mice.”

Why Scientists Are Searching for Cures Underwater – Newsweek

.

Childhood cancer survival in Australia

“Survival outcomes using the period method for 11903 children diagnosed with cancer between 1983 and 2006 and prevalent at any time between 1997 and 2006. The overall relative survival was 90.4% after 1 year,  79.5% after 5 years and 74.7% after 20 years.”

Population-based survival estimates for childhood cancer in Australia during the period 1997–2006

www.nature.com

.

Accutane (cis-retinoic acid or isotretinoin) and depression?

A child with neuroblastoma is far more more often a preschooler than a teen. So the risk of suicide and depression is unlikely with such small children. It is a concern with the few teens and young adults with neuroblastoma on this drug, especially since the dosing is 2 to 10 times higher than what is prescribed for acne, and the lower dose is the basis for all the previous studies looking at incidence of depression and suicide. This small study gives important evidence that the drug may not contribute entirely to increased risk:

Severe Acne Linked to Suicide Risk Even Before Treatment Is Started

cme.medscape.com

In a retrospective Swedish cohort, suicide attempts were associated with severe acne even before treatment with isotretinoin was started.

.

.

Trial open at Penn State Hershey Medical Center

A Phase I Trial Combining Decitabine, IFN-gamma, and Vaccine Therapy for Patients With Neuroblastoma

The phase I trial will enroll 15 children ages 2 months to 17 years who have relapsed neuroblastoma.

The stated purpose:

This treatment study for relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma involves an autologous cancer testis (CT) antigen specific dendritic cell (DC) vaccine preceded by decitabine as a demethylating chemotherapy and IFN-gamma to stimulate an immune response.

The vaccine is given in the following schedule:

New trial for neuroblastoma opens at University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill

Temsirolimus and Valproic Acid in Treating Young Patients With Relapsed Neuroblastoma, Bone Sarcoma, or Soft Tissue Sarcoma

This phase I study will enroll 20 patients age 2 to 18 to determine the maximum tolerated dose of temsirolimus in combination with valproic acid, as well as safety, pharmacokinetics, and progression-free survival. Principal investigator is Dr Julie Blatt.

Valproic acid (VPA) has been used to treat epilepsy for decades. Recent research has show VPA to be a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), cell cycle modulator, and an antiangiogenetic agent. VPA also induces tumor cell death. Czech researchers published in March 2010 :

Preclinical data suggest that the anticancer effect of chemotherapy is augmented when VPA is used in combination with cytostatics. Besides the effects of pretreatment with HDAC inhibitors, which increases the efficiency of 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, VP-16, ellipticine, doxorubicin and cisplatin, pre-exposure to VPA increases the cytotoxicity of topoisomerase II inhibitors. There are two suggested cell death mechanisms caused by potentiation of anticancer drugs by HDAC inhibitors that are neither exclusive nor synergistic. The first involves apoptosis and can be both p53 dependent or independent; the second involves mechanisms other than apoptosis. In resistant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), VPA restores sensitivity to imatinib. We have demonstrated the synergistic effects of VPA and cisplatin in neuroblastoma cells. VPA can be taken orally, crosses the blood brain barrier and can be used for extended periods.[1]

There are 229 valproic acid clinical trials listed in the NIH database; 68 are recruiting and 26 are for cancer conditions. There are 88 temsirolimus trials currently open to treat cancer.

In 2008 Italian researchers reported on the mechanism of cell death from valproic acid on 2 NB cell lines:

To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of an HDAC inhibitor-dependent activation of the p53 pathway in neuroblastoma cells known for an abnormal p53 function that is responsible for their resistance to chemotherapy. As a consequence of this ability to restore p53 function, we consider HDAC inhibitors to be a promising class of drugs for the treatment of chemoresistant neuroblastoma tumours.[2]

Temsirolimus is a specific inhibitor of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) and interferes with the synthesis of proteins that regulate proliferation, growth, and survival of tumor cells. FDA approval was granted in 2007 for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. It was used previously in a frontline NB study at St Jude’s. The NIH clinical trials site currently lists 15 open trials for children with solid tumors using temsirolimus in combination with a wide range of other agents.

There is apparently no published data (or submitted meeting abstracts) in the medical literature for the preclinical work using the combination of temsirolimus and valproic acid on cancer cell lines.

References

1. Curr Drug Targets. 2010 Mar;11(3):361-79. Valproic Acid in the complex therapy of malignant tumors. PMID: 20214599

2. Br J Pharmacol. 2008 Feb;153(4):657-68. Inhibitors of histone deacetylase (HDAC) restore the p53 pathway in neuroblastoma cells. PMID: 18059320 [free fulltext]

New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy (NANT) consortium offers trials for relapsed and refractory neuroblastoma

Dr Kate Matthay spoke at the Children’s Neuroblastoma Cancer Foundation CNCF parent conference in Chicago July 10, 2010, detailing the status of several NANT trials. She mentioned that these trials open and close periodically, so contacting the principal investigator is the best way for an interested parent to get the most current information about the trial.

NANT is a consortium of researchers and investigators that now includes 15 institutions in North America, lead by Dr Kate Matthay (UCSF) and Dr Judith Villablanca (CHLA). NANT was formed in 2000 as a result of National Cancer Institute (NCI) award for a proposal submitted by Dr Robert Seeger.

Current member institutions are:

• C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, University of Michigan – Ann Arbor, MI
• Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta (CHOA) – Atlanta, Georgia
• Childrens Hospital and Regional Medical Center – Seattle, WA
• Children’s Hospital Boston, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute – Boston, MA
• Childrens Hospital Los Angeles – Los Angeles, CA
• Children’s Hospital Medical Center – Cincinnati, OH
• Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia – Philadelphia, PA
• Cook Children’s Health Care System – Fort Worth, TX
• Hospital for Sick Children – Toronto, Ontario Canada
• Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital – Palo Alto, CA
• Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital of New York-Presbyterian (Columbia) – New York, NY
• Texas Childrens Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine – Houston, TX
• University of California, San Francisco – San Francisco, CA
• University of Chicago Comer Children’s Hospital – Chicago, IL
• University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center – Madison, WI

It is significant to note that the core NANT investigators are the ones who conducted the research in the 1990s that established the current global standard of care for neuroblastoma, including the use of stem cell transplant and cis-retinoic acid. The NANT trials that are planned and conducted now for relapsed and refractory neuroblastoma provide the rationale for better future frontline therapies.

Open trials are:

• N99-02: Modulation of Intensive Melphalan (L-PAM) by Buthionine Sulfoximine (BSO) (NSC-326321) and Autologous Stem Cell Support For Recurrent High-Risk Neuroblastoma (NCI 68).
• N2004-03: A Phase I study of intravenous fenretinide in pediatric neuroblastoma.
• N2004-04: A Phase I Study of Fenretinide Lym-X-Sorb^TM (LXS) Oral Powder in Patients with Recurrent or Resistant Neuroblastoma (IND # 68,254)
• N2004-06: Irinotecan and Vincristine with ¹³¹I-MIBG Therapy for Resistant/Relapsed High-Risk Neuroblastoma
• N2007-01: A Phase 2a Study of Ultratrace^TM Iobenguane I 131 in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma
• N2007-02: A Phase I Study Of Bevacizumab With Bolus And Metronomic Cyclophosphamide And Zoledronic Acid In Children With Recurrent Or Refractory Neuroblastoma
• N2007-03: Vorinostat and MIBG in Recurrent or Resistant Neuroblastoma Patients

Dr Matthay presented an update on NANT drug trials, and Dr Greg Yanik spoke about trials using MIBG radiotherapy.

CEP-701

In her presentation Dr Matthay noted that new NANT trials will focus on the use of approved agents to avoid the unfortunate circumstance when a company decides to drop a new drug because of lack of efficacy in other cancers. This is what happened to CEP-701, a Trk inhibitor, even though it was granted orphan drug status in 2006. In 10 dose levels given to 47 patients no MTD (maximum tolerated dose) was reached. There were 2 partial responses and 9 stable disease in the neuroblastoma relapse/refractory children.

Oral fenretinide, IV fenretinide

A new phase I trial using the oral powder formulation of fenretinide is open for relapsed or refractory children, and those in a second remission are also be eligible. An arm will include the use of the antifungal drug ketoconazole to help raise the plasma levels of fenretinide. A phase I trial using IV fenretinide has also opened, and a video consent explains the trial. The results of the first phase I oral powder was presented at ASCO in 2009, showing 4 complete responses and 6 stable disease in 30 patients.[1]

BSO/Melphalan

As of July this phase I trial accrued 18 patients with dose levels 20-64 mg/m2. The next dose level is 80 mg/m2. Total to be accrued is 30. A video consent explains this study in more detail.

Zometa + Cytoxan

The phase I has been completed and responses are being evaluated. A new phase I has opened that uses intravenous and oral Cytoxan in combination with zometa and Avastin (a humanized antibody that targets VEGF-A or vascular endothelial growth factor A). Since December 2009 6 patients have enrolled.

Vorinostat (SAHA) and cis-retinoic acid

SAHA, approved for lymphoma, is a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) and slows neuroblastoma growth. It has shown preclinical synergy with cis-retinoic acid.

Aurora A kinase inhibitor

Aurora A kinase inhibitor has shown increased effectiveness against MYCN-amplified cell lines, and NANT is planning to combine this inhibitor with irinotecan and temozolomide in a new trial.

Emphasis on older patients

Neuroblastoma normally affects very young children, but the needs of the small population of adolescents and young adults also require special attention. This is becoming a new focus for NANT, first demonstrated by the raised age limits for NANT trials to 30. Some NANT investigators see a large number of teens and young adults with neuroblastoma.

References

1. J Clin Oncol 27:15s, 2009 (suppl; abstr 10009)

New donor transplant trial open for relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma

Dr Sandeep Soni spoke at CNCF (Children’s Neuroblastoma Cancer Foundation) Parent Conference in Chicago July 10, 2010. Dr Soni is a member of the Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant program at Nationwide Children’s Hospital and an Assistant Professor of Clinical Pediatrics at Ohio State University College of Medicine in Columbus.

Dr Soni presented the novel allogeneic transplant trial now open for relapsed and refractory neuroblastoma in Columbus:

Fludarabine, Busulfan, and Antithymocyte Globulin Followed By Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Young Patients With High-Risk Neuroblastoma That Has Relapsed or Not Responded to Treatment

This is a phase II study with a planned accrual of 25 children 1 to 18 years old. The goals of this study are to determine the feasibility of this protocol using a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen, engraftment, transplant-related mortality, and development of acute and chronic graft-vs-host disease. Secondary goals are to learn about the role of natural killer (NK) cells as effectors of graft-vs-tumor effect in these patients, and the role of killer immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) mismatches in the donor-recipient pairs on the outcomes of these patients.

Dr Soni explained that the role of NK cells are much better understood today, and recently the potential importance of mismatch in KIR is being explored. He also noted that depleting T-cells reduces the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) whereas in leukemia T-cells are required for graft-versus-tumor effect. In neuroblastoma, there is evidence that NK cells are more important for graft-versus-tumor. Modified T-cells have also been explored by investigators at CHOP (Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia).

History of allogeneic transplants in neuroblastoma

While allogeniec transplants have been used much less frequently in solid tumors, research continues to explore the potential for graft-versus-tumor effect seen in liquid tumors, primarily leukemia.

In February 2010 Dr Stephen Grupp and colleagues from CHOP published a review of “Autologous and allogeneic cellular therapies for high-risk pediatric solid tumors” including the work on modified T-cells:

Chimeric immunoreceptor (CIR). The CIR is an engineered T-cell receptor (TCR) comprised of an antibody-like extracellular domain fused to an intracellular, functional TCR domain. The CIR was first described by Eshhar in 1993, and has been developed and extended over the last 15 years. The first report of CIR-modified T cells specific for neuroblastoma was published in 2001, and research since that time has led to an early-phase clinical trial published in 2007. To redirect T cells safely against a tumor, the CIR must target a tumor-specific antigen that is minimally expressed on normal tissues.

These trials, and others examining the use of CIR-modified T cells in other malignancies, have shown the feasibility of using genetic modification to redirect autologous T cells against malignancies. As technologies improve, and the experience with CIRs increases, harnessing a patient’s own immune system in the treatment for high-risk pediatric cancers will likely become a promising new therapeutic frontier.[1]

Dr Grupp also published a review of transplants for neuroblastoma in January 2008 (fulltext is available):

Finally, as an alternative to autologous SCT, some groups have studied allogeneic SCT in an attempt to harness an immunotherapeutic effect. A graft-versus-malignancy effect has been well described in allogeneic transplant for liquid tumors, but has not yet been convincingly demonstrated in the setting of solid tumors. Although initial studies of conventional allogeneic SCT for high-risk neuroblastoma failed to show clear benefit, the advent of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens has provided hope that reduced intensity conditioning will reduce TRM and allow for the detection of a therapeutic benefit. As a result, institutions are beginning to explore the possibility of an allogeneic effect in neuroblastoma. At this point, this is still an investigational and unusual application of allogeneic transplant, with 38 such cases reported to the EBMT from 1991 to 2002. Some recent case reports have provided preliminary evidence for a graft-versus-tumor effect in neuroblastoma. A 2003 case report described a patient who underwent allogeneic SCT after a relapse. Although the patient received further chemotherapy after the allogeneic transplant and response could not be correlated to GVHD, the patient did enter a CR sustained for at least 4 years. In a more recent report, development of GVHD correlated temporally with disease response in a patient who had undergone a reduced-intensity allogeneic bone marrow transplant. In a similar regard, the group at Columbia has been testing reduced intensity allogeneic cord blood transplants in patients with a wide range of diagnoses, including neuroblastoma.[2]

The use of allogeneic transplants may hold promise in neuroblastoma, with progress being made in reducing the risk of acute graft-versus-host disease and reduced treatment-related mortality with reduced intensity regimens. Families who are interested in pursuing this treatment choice for a child with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma should be aware that some therapies available in current clinical trials prohibit prior donor transplants as part of the eligibility, but many current clinical trials do allow prior allogeneic transplant.

1. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2010 Feb;57(1):47-66. Autologous and allogeneic cellular therapies for high-risk pediatric solid tumors. PMID: 20307711

2. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008 January; 41(2): 159–165. Stem cell transplantation for neuroblastoma. PMCID: PMC2892221 [fulltext]